Showing posts with label symbolism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label symbolism. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Let me tell you a story...


Let me show you what I mean...


‘Show, don’t tell’ is a difficult concept because there’s no way around the fact that written words are simply marks on a page. They have no colour, sound or movement and are only two dimensional. They aren’t photos, videos, graphics or paintings. Let’s face it, no matter which ones we use, written words tell things—left to right, top to bottom, one word at a time.

How do we add dimension to them? The more obvious ways, like dressing them up in bold or italics or empowering them with exclamation marks, don’t seem to impress editors or readers. We must be more creative.

If I write, “She was embarrassed,” that is considered in literary circles to be ‘telling.’ If I say, “Her cheeks reddened and she turned away,” that is showing—although of course my words are simply telling you her cheeks reddened and she turned away. 

What makes it showing is readers must become involved in the writing, must draw their own conclusions about why her cheeks reddened.

I’ve discovered two main aspects to what makes writing ‘showing’. One is writing so that readers are enticed into becoming intellectually involved in the story and the other is writing to elicit their emotional involvement. 

Eliciting emotional involvement is often done through powerful word choice and symbolism along with superb character development. Getting readers intellectually involved, requires what I call ‘empty spaces’.

Research has shown that humans are attracted to empty spaces. It is why we find things like lace and ferns more beautiful than solid fabrics and poplar leaves. It’s why newspaper graphic artists balance print with white space on page layouts. The hypothesis is that our mind feels compelled to fill empty spaces, thus drawing us into the visual field and giving us the feeling we are becoming part of what we are viewing—something we apparently find enjoyable.

This could also explain why readers like being shown not told—it compels them to insert their own thoughts, feelings and conclusions into the story. They become part of what is happening.

Some writers mistakenly believe that ‘showing’ is using flowery language and extensive verbiage in an attempt to draw pictures with their words. Quite the opposite is in fact what is needed. Good writers leave spaces in their descriptions--vacancies that compel the reader to intellectually participate.

Excellent writers goes to great lengths to keep the reader from realizing they are investing themselves in the story, the more subtle the techniques, the more profound the literature. Poetry is probably on the top end of the scale, with each word demanding an intellectual and emotional investment from the reader. What is being said and how does it apply to me? Poets (and novelists as well) often also use the rhythm and structure of words and sentences to further draw readers into their writing—between each beat is a space that the reader must fill.

Symbolism also requires the investment of the reader. It’s pretty easy to pick out which of these sentences ‘shows’ and which one ‘tells’: “She was nervous.” vs “The feral howls of a lone wolf drew nearer.”

As with all writing techniques and advice, showing not telling can be misused and overused. I’m often guilt of that. Clues I give that are meant to spark a reader’s emotions or understanding are often not clear to those who don’t share my cultural and background experiences. The void I leave for the reader to fill must be tiny if it is important that a reader understand a specific event.  I don’t have to ‘tell’ them Shrug is guilty, but I do have to tell them more than ‘Shrug diverted his eyes,’ because in many cultures, diverting one’s eyes is a sign of respect, not guilt.

Although flowery writing isn’t needed to create reader involvement, powerful writing is. Avoid cliché’s because we’ve heard them so often, they don’t elicit much of a response in us. Find unique words and phrases that the reader has never before read. The more specific a word or phrase, the more powerful it is. “A violent thunderstorm” vs “Rolling black clouds and shards of lightening.” 

Combining powerful writing with empty spaces and emotional connotation takes everything up yet one more level.

The thunderstorm made her nervous. Or…

Above her, black clouds roiled and shards of lightening split the sky. In the distance a lone wolf howled. She shivered.

Brought to you by THE TRAZ
 
viewBook.at/B007JW8RMA
"...you will be drawn into their lives & story."
"I just had to finish it..." 
"It was hard to put down (even for sleep)" 
 "Great Strong Story--a wonderful read"

Friday, January 2, 2015

Dark and Stormy Nights...and all that Jazz


Symbolically Speaking... 


Way back when before I was published, many beta readers complained that although I had dialogue and plot down pat, everything was happening in a vacuum—I did not set the scene. I had ‘talking heads’, they said.

In real life I’m intensely aware of my surroundings, often capturing things with my camera that no one else notices. I also like waxing poetic about the interplay of light and shadow and life and death. I love adjectives and adverbs. However, in real life I also get bored quickly when reading lengthy descriptions in a novel—get on with the story, already, I say to myself—skimming over what seems to be irrelevancies.

But I am wise enough to know not to ignore the critics. To pacify them without boring myself and my less literary fans, I decided to make my scenic descriptions relevant in more ways than one. I was going to use powerful adjectives, some with double meanings, some with alliteration, some with rhythm. I was going to make each scenic description a coy contribution to the emotions driving the plot. A dark and stormy night, indeed. I would give my readers green grass poking through the snow when hope was on the way. We’d have icy blizzards foreshadowing death, meteorite showers accenting romance, the stench of diesel announcing danger.

Excerpt from FIREWALLS:
Outside Sergeant Kindle’s window, off to the horizon, a winter storm was brewing. The top sides of the towering clouds were glistening a bright white but the darkness between the fluffy layers held a warning. She watched the building power, reaching higher, growing darker, moving in. “Katrina, you wanted to see me?” The door slammed closed behind her, snapping her back to reality. 
Whether or not readers notice the symbolism and grasp the intent, the descriptions serve to set the scene, the time of year and sometimes the time of day. Hopefully they will also subliminally influence readers’ emotions and draw them deeper into the story.

Symbolism doesn’t have to be relegated to scene setting. Characters’ names, place names and even the book title itself can hold innuendo. Writers often slip symbolism into character descriptions. What kind of man has steel-grey eyes? What do we expect to see from mousy men and women with fiery red hair?

In this excerpt from FATAL ERROR, it’s no coincidence that young Katrina’s distant, cool, metallic guardian is named Mr. Cooper.
Cooper was seated on a couch in Debra's living room. He stood when Katrina entered the room. "I hear you've been a pretty busy lady lately." She knew he was trying to sound gentle, but it didn't work. He was staid and lawyer-ish, always had been
Give symbolism a try—it’s fun to write. And, the next time you read a novel, keep your eyes out for those symbols that the skilled author has covertly used to manipulate your emotions.

Eileen Schuh, Author
DISPASSIONATE LIES
FIREWALLS
FATAL ERROR

Schrödinger's Cat
THE TRAZ